Trump, Tiptoeing the Edge of the Constitution: The Night Before Taking Office, He Capitalized on a MEME Coin Craze
Original Article by: Zack Guzmán, Founder and Host of Coinage_media
Article Translation by: Ashley, BlockBeats
Editor's Note: The author points out that the Trump family cleverly circumvented the Constitution's Emoluments Clause controversy when launching the $TRUMP and $MELANIA tokens. By strategically entering the NFT and cryptocurrency space early on, they leveraged Web3 to maximize their interests within legal boundaries.
The following is the original content (slightly reorganized for better readability):
The Trump family rapidly rolled out the $TRUMP and $MELANIA tokens just before the inauguration ceremony for a very crucial reason. Whether you love or hate Trump, the fact is, delaying even one more day could have exposed him to the risk of constitutional violations and potential impeachment once again.
According to the Constitution, the President must not abuse their power for personal gain. In particular, the Emoluments Clause explicitly prohibits the President from receiving benefits or profits from foreign governments. This is precisely why these tokens are so noteworthy.
Over the past few years, the Trump couple has been testing the market waters through various NFT releases. They have used separate companies and seemingly different teams. These companies have paid Melania and Trump respective fees, thus maintaining the "independence" of direct token purchases.

According to Trump's public tax filings, he earned approximately $7.2 million through involvement in NFT-related transactions. This income is linked to his partnership with CIC Digital in the $TRUMP project. Melania, on the other hand, earned over $330,000 through an agreement related to NFT sales.

Despite all this appearing convoluted, one thing is certain: launching these tokens before Trump formally became President made things easier. Failing to do so would have made it easier to allege that Trump benefited from the presidency and violated the Emoluments Clause.
While our founding fathers hoped to prevent the President from unduly profiting from power, I don't think Jefferson or Madison ever discussed meme coins. What do you think?
You may also like

Fidelity Mid-Year Review: 6 Key Trends in Digital Assets for 2026

The midlife crisis of Crypto GP: Without PMF, there is no next check from LP

Why is Peter Thiel, behind Palantir, preparing an exit in Argentina?

The broken defense of Solana's guardians: In order to tear apart Hyperliquid, they actually picked up the script that Ethereum once criticized itself?

Interview with macro master Raoul Pal: The AI competition is giving rise to an "economic singularity," don't easily give up your chips in the next four years

Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times his investment in storage stocks? (Six) - The Trap of Homogeneous Products

"Trapped in the cryptocurrency world: Don't let the anxiety of missing out force you onto the most dangerous last train."

BIS's latest research: The future of stablecoins and the global monetary landscape

Morning News | Michael Saylor releases Bitcoin Tracker information; Aave releases post-attack investigation on Kelp rsETH bridge; Gravity Bridge announces service suspension after being attacked

Three years later: Looking back at my judgment of ChatGPT in 2023

From Casino Tools to Global Pricing Machines: The NYSE Leader's Perspective on Hyperliquid

A Detailed Analysis of "Stock God Serenity" Investment Methodology

Sharplink CEO: The future of Ethereum is unfolding

Morning Report | Korea Investment & Securities and OKX plan to jointly acquire 40% of Coinone; Polymarket denies implementing KYC comprehensively; Grayscale delays U.S. stock IPO plans

Bit Digital CEO: Why I Bought More ETH

A Decade of Three Waves of Stock Tokenization from Bitget's Reality: An Unfinished Financial Exploration

"Hu Run Baifu" Dialogue with Sun Yuchen: A New Paradigm of Value Circulation in the Web3 Transformation Cycle




